Integration Bunny.net dns and vanity nameservers [LOGGED]

AdamM

Hi
Bunny.net It offers fast dns and at a good price
For me, it's a better alternative to cloudflare
In addition, it offers free vanity nameservers, which is a big advantage.
Additionally, there is an option to set cdn proxy using dns.
This will allow to use the global dns network without using the dns role.
Additionally, dns templating in enhance I would like to know the functions of enabling or disabling cdn proxy by default.

Please vote for this feature so the enhance team considers it a high priority for us.

gavin

Geo DNS is also available for free with Bunny. +1

Ned

Have spoken to Adam from enhance and it could be coming, Once Cloudflare is done they will have the tools in place to add any other platforms.

+1 for Bunny being next 🙂

AdamM

Ned
Exactly. Just curious how long it will take. The roadmap is tight.

tecreasey

I am using Bunny.net for a lot of services right now and I would definitely upvote this as an alternative to Cloudflare.

manu

+1 for bunny.net integration!

Adrien

+1 with 2 questions for you guys if you're on LSWS.

How does Bunny play with Litespeed in general (server + plugin) VS Quic.cloud?
Do you need to install a plugin on your WP site or no need to?

Ned

Adrien

Works fine on LSWS, Won't play nice with QUIC.Cloud - and is much better so no real reason to keep that around.

However would suggest a NGINX + FastCGI installation any time of the week :p

Bunny Optimizer is a good value if you need webp or minification on their end.

Using their DNS you don't need to do, Using their CDN you can use their plugin or any other plugin which lets you configure a CDN, which is expected as something has to adjust the cdn url values.

Adrien

Ned Thanks Ned. Yeah, I tried Nginx once in my life using GridPane. I didn't like the complexity of setting it up VS LSWS, so I never looked back. I also really like LSCP.
But I keep doubting myself when I read you because I didn't do any "serious" benchmarking and I feel pain from paying expensive license costs per server.
I just saw many shared hosting companies moving to LSWS so, it kind of validated my choice.

Having said that, If you're open to the idea, we could organize a quick performance comparison of WordPress on Enhance LSWS vs Enhance Ngnix. I always have time for this kind of exercise if any of you guys are interested too.

Ned

Adrien

We run litespeed on all our large shared servers, 600+ Domains and it really does perform well and gives all the users things like quic, lscache and no brainer setups.

Happy to run a comparison on DirectAdmin as it currently supports NGINX and litespeed webservers, My tests 4-5 Months ago left NGINX on an edge almost every time, However it gets a lot more complex at scale, With enhancd where the idea is multiple smaller nodes the no costs NGINX and how performant it is makes a lot of sense.