AdamM +1 for me too. BTW i discovered a few days ago on LiteSpeed slack their team giving the link for LiteSpeed ARM source. Before that I thought too it wasn't compatible.

      Adrien I asked them about it once and they said they were working on it.
      There may already be a beta version.

          I don’t understand the demand for ARM, they’re not as good as x86, not as fast, etc. they’re catching up, but no where near yet. I’ve tested Oracle ARM against Intel Xeon and they don’t even come within a margin.

            Zoinkies that's good to know and i read the same feedback in the past. However, im still hopeful and want to make my own benchmark on LiteSpeed. Maybe this would be an economical option for small static sites and blogs.

                Adrien Yea, I had high hopes for it, but it’s just a bit mediocre. I think it’ll fit in the “budget” hosting, not specialist etc

                  AdamM That’s cool and all, but core count doesn’t really matter it’s core speed that does, and one AO core doesn’t equal one Xeon core, or anywhere near.

                      a month later

                      ARM-based CPUs do not currently score well in PHP benchmarks. However, if they achieve significant gains in IPC (Instructions Per Cycle), they will become very attractive in the long run. Therefore, everything should be ARM-compatible, and compiling for ARM is not difficult. It's just a matter of time. ARM CPUs are improving with each product cycle. As of now, the 7700x is the top performer in PHP Bench.

                      3 months later

                      Litespeed 6.1.2 now support ARM64 đź‘Ť

                      What would be the advantage of deploying arm servers instead of x86.

                        3 months later

                        +1

                        ARM64/ARM v8 is for our infrastructure a feature that would be required to switch to enhance.com.

                        Follow @enhancecp