Let’s be honest: these recurring debates about “who invested in what ten years ago” are completely derailing the focus from what actually matters — the product we have in front of us today.
Yes, Adam — or someone on the team — had past connections to WHG. So what? Does that automatically invalidate everything being built now? Are we judging a modern solution based on some corporate ghosts from the past? So no one is allowed to evolve?
That’s like saying someone who once made a mistake should be defined by it forever. That’s not technical criticism — that’s bottled-up resentment.
I was once a huge supporter of cPanel. Today, I want nothing to do with it. Does that mean I’m responsible for what they’re doing now? Of course not. People change. Needs change. Projects evolve.
If there are real issues with Enhance — bugs, poor decisions, broken promises — let’s talk about those. That’s useful and constructive.
But constantly replaying the “WHG, Enix, etc.” tape as if it’s a definitive argument is obsessive and counterproductive.
If Enhance works for you, use it. If it doesn’t, move on.
But using the panel daily while simultaneously trying to discredit the team behind it… that’s not constructive feedback — that’s veiled sabotage.
The truth is, for some people, the problem isn’t Enhance. It’s that the panel isn’t moving at the pace they think it should. And since they can’t control that, they inflate their ego with cynical comments and technical martyrdom in every thread they touch.
I’d also like to see more features. That’s why I suggest them. I believe that if they’re useful for me, they’ll be useful for others too.
This community deserves better.
Let’s talk about features. Let’s talk about support. Let’s talk about real-world results.
But let’s leave the corporate trauma from the 2010s where it belongs: in the past.
